Friday, February 24, 2006

I have my computer back!

No, my computer wasn't broken. Hubby has been on a "normal" shift all this week due to a training course. The course ran 8am - 4pm Monday - Thursday. That means every morning when I normally get online with my cup of coffee, he was up and needing to "quick check email". And every evening after Frodo was in bed, he was hogging the computer for a couple minutes of "homework" and then endless video game playing.... So I've had only very limited access to the computer this week. My withdrawls were so bad I actually went to the gym! Twice!

I'm SOOOOOO glad he's back on his regular shift tonight. Now I have to rearrange the butt impression in the computer chair cushion to make it fit MY butt again. ;)

Sunday, February 19, 2006

Does anyone else think...

...this year's Olympic medals look like nicely painted CDs?

I've finally seen something of the Olympics. Until tonight, I hadn't stopped to watch one moment of it. Tonight I was *blessed* to see some ice dancing, some speed skating, and some bobsledding. Maybe not blessed....

It's so funny how the Olympics is edited anymore. (Brace yourself for one of the "when I was a kid..." moments!) When I was a kid, I remember when the Olympics was going, you saw nothing BUT the Olympics on television. But then again, those were pre-cable days too, so the network running the Olympics didn't have a ton of competition. I liked watching it that way. If I wanted to watch downhill skiing, I didn't HAVE to watch something else as well. And I got to see all the competitors, not just a select few the network decided to show.

I do prefer the winter Olympics over the summer Olympics. I think the winter events are much more interesting. At least for me.

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

Whups s'more...

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/14/cheney/index.html

Maybe his injuries are not as mild as originally shared with the public? I still believe that to penetrate Mr. Whittington's clothing then his skin, deep enough that doctors are being "conservative" by not removing pellets, he was shot at a much closer distance than 30 yards. In fact, to get serious enough injuries to be put in ICU, he was probably shot at a distance closer than 30 FEET. (Here's a primer on shotgun testing patterns. Have fun.)

And knowing what I know about the medical field, (seeing as I work in the medical field) a patient isn't in ICU just for fun or for a private room.... ICU is a serious place to be, and you are there only if your condition is considered to be unpredictable and treacherous enough that you need more intense and frequent monitoring and care.

Some of the current discussion in this incident circles around the question - "Who's fault is it?" Some say it's Whittington's fault for "not following hunting protocol". Others say it's Cheney's fault for not noticing his hunting companion had returned. To answer this question myself, I turn to the cardinal rules of gun handling - The NRA gun safety rules. And specifically I will point out this particular rule:

"Know your target and what is beyond. Be absolutely sure you have identified your target beyond any doubt. Equally important, be aware of the area beyond your target. This means observing your prospective area of fire before you shoot. Never fire in a direction in which there are people or any other potential for mishap. Think first. Shoot second."

Also, the "Ten Commandments of Shooting Safety", which are routinely taught in every hunter safety class. (Yes, I have taken hunter safety.) From this list, I will specifically point out #6:

"Know your safe zone-of-fire and stick to it.Your safe zone-of-fire is that area or direction in which you can safely fire a shot. It is "down range" at a shooting facility. In the field it is that mental image you draw in your mind with every step you take. Be sure you know where your companions are at all times. Never swing your gun or bow out of your safe zone-of-fire. Know the safe carries when there are persons to your sides, in front of, or behind you. If in doubt, never take a shot. When hunting, wear daylight fluorescent orange so you can be seen from a distance or in heavy cover." (emphasis mine)

Seems to me, the person pulling the trigger is the one at fault.... I don't care who is pulling the trigger, republican or democrat, male or female, black, white, or purple polka dotted - the person who pulls the trigger is the one responsible for what happens with that shot after that trigger is pulled. Period.

Here's an example of what happens to a normal citizen that accidentally shoots and wounds a hunting companion.

And god forbid Mr. Whittington should die, here's an example of what happens to a normal citizen that accidentally shoots and kills a hunting companion.

I have a feeling there is WAAAAAAAYYY more to this story than what is out there, and the fact that the police weren't allowed to speak to the VP until 8am the next day speaks volumes. Two things come to mind for me:

1) Alcohol was involved. (Which might explain why the VP wouldn't have seen someone in blaze orange in his sight. And if you've ever seen someone outdoors in blaze orange, even in low light, you know it's hard to miss!)

2) Stories needed to be ironed out. People involved needed to pow-wow to get their stories straight.

The whole thing is awfully fishy. And as usual with this administration, I'm sure we won't get the truth.

Sunday, February 12, 2006

Our vice president shot someone yesterday

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/12/cheney/index.html

Whups.

Tuesday, February 07, 2006

Yep.

I agree here and here.

Not that I have anything to hide. Get your warrants and listen to whoever you want and I will have nothing to complain about. Anyone who thinks they can sidestep that part of the process is definitely someone that has something to hide....

Sunday, February 05, 2006

A little fun for the weekend

So my pal Carley did this "Five Factor Peronality Profile" and found it interesting. I thought I'd try it too. I enjoy little quizzes like this. This one seems pretty accurate for me, although some days I think it would change based on how I felt that day.






Your Five Factor Personality Profile



Extroversion:



You have low extroversion.

You are quiet and reserved in most social situations.

A low key, laid back lifestyle is important to you.

You tend to bond slowly, over time, with one or two people.



Conscientiousness:



You have medium conscientiousness.

You're generally good at balancing work and play.

When you need to buckle down, you can usually get tasks done.

But you've been known to goof off when you know you can get away with it.



Agreeableness:



You have medium agreeableness.

You're generally a friendly and trusting person.

But you also have a healthy dose of cynicism.

You get along well with others, as long as they play fair.



Neuroticism:



You have low neuroticism.

You are very emotionally stable and mentally together.

Only the greatest setbacks upset you, and you bounce back quickly.

Overall, you are typically calm and relaxed - making others feel secure.



Openness to experience:



Your openness to new experiences is medium.

You are generally broad minded when it come to new things.

But if something crosses a moral line, there's no way you'll approve of it.

You are suspicious of anything too wacky, though you do still consider creativity a virtue.



How does this test work for you? Do you find it fairly accurate? If you take it, let me know by leaving me a post!
Have a fun Super Bowl Sunday! I plan on watching some commercials. I could care less about the game. ;)